International Society of Surgery (ISS)

Société Internationale de Chirurgie (SIC)

Integrated Societies: IATSIC | IASMEN | BSI | ISDS

COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY FOR LONG TERM ASSISTED ENTERAL FEED IN TRAUMA PATIENTS - A RANDOMIZED PILOT STUDY narendra3483@gmail.com

 
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY FOR LONG TERM ASSISTED ENTERAL FEED IN TRAUMA PATIENTS - A RANDOMIZED PILOT STUDY
Author Details
5
Including the presenting author
Narendra Choudhary narendra3483@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences Trauma Surgery New Delhi India *
Dinesh Bagaria dr_bagaria@yahoo.co.in All India Institute of Medical Sciences Trauma Surgery New Delhi India
Abhinav Kumar drabhinav1975@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences Trauma Surgery New Delhi India
Biplab Mishra biplabaiims@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences Trauma Surgery New Delhi India
Amit Gupta amitguptaaiims@gmail.com All India Institute of Medical Sciences Trauma Surgery New Delhi India
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Narendra Choudhary
narendra3483@gmail.com
India
Abstract
Oral or Poster
Enteral-feed in polytrauma patient is crucial but often overlooked. Many such patients are unable to accept oral feeds for extended periods due to head or maxillofacial injuries. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is the current standard of care for providing long term assisted enteral feeding. However it is associated with procedure or tube related complications. Laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) provides an alternative to PEG placement with lesser complications among pediatric patients. However its role among adult trauma victims is still unclear and paving the way for this feasibility trial.
Patients with severe head or maxillofacial injuries requiring long-term assisted enteral feeding, randomised into two cohorts. Patients on antibiotic therapy or history of abdominal surgery excluded. Post-procedure, both groups were monitored for signs of procedure and/or tube related complications. Procedural costs were calculated based on required consumables and investigations prompted by any complications.
30 patients with mean age of 38±14.52 years recruited. Mean procedural duration was 27.13±7.68 & 78.6 ±11.72 minutes for PEG and LG respectively. Enteral feed initiated on day 1 in 8(53%) & 03(20%), day 2 in 5(33%) & 9(60%) patients after PEG & LG placement. 01(6.67%) and 07(47%) patient developed gastrostomy site infection following LG & PEG. Peri-tubal leakage and dislodgement was noted in 05 and 04 patient following PEG, in 01 and 02 patient after LG. Procedural cost was $110±30 & 281±30 for PEG & LG.
LG, though associated with higher procedural costs and longer operative times, demonstrates a lower incidence of surgical site infections and tube-related complications.
 
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
 
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
Category
4 Trauma & Intensive Care organized by IATSIC
4.01 Trauma surgery
Withdrawn
0
Abstract Prizes
No
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript conforming to the format of orignial articles in the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025