International Society of Surgery (ISS)

Société Internationale de Chirurgie (SIC)

Integrated Societies: IATSIC | IASMEN | BSI | ISDS

EVALUATING A BLENDED-LEARNING MODEL IN TRAUMA EDUCATION: A NON-INFERIORITY STUDY OF THE DUTCH HYBRID DSATC COURSE marly.iskander@radboudumc.nl

433-06
EVALUATING A BLENDED-LEARNING MODEL IN TRAUMA EDUCATION: A NON-INFERIORITY STUDY OF THE DUTCH HYBRID DSATC COURSE
Author Details
3
Including the presenting author
Marly Iskander marly.iskander@radboudumc.nl Radboudumc Faculty of medicine Nijmegen Netherlands
Frederike Haverkamp Frederike.Haverkamp@radboudumc.nl Radboudumc Surgery Nijmegen Netherlands
Edward Tan Edward.Tan@radboudumc.nl Radboudumc Surgery Nijmegen Netherlands *
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Marly Iskander
marly.iskander@radboudumc.nl
Netherlands
Abstract
Oral only
The Definitive Surgical and Anaesthetic Trauma Care (DSATC) course enhances healthcare professionals’ ability to manage polytrauma patients. In 2020, the course shifted from a traditional three-day, face-to-face format to a two-day blended-learning model combining asynchronous online preparation with in-person training. This study evaluates the impact of the blended-learning format on participants’ self-assessed confidence in technical and non-technical skills.
This retrospective non-inferiority study compared confidence gains in skills between participants of the traditional and blended-learning DSATC courses. Quantitative pre- and post-course questionnaires measured self-assessed confidence. Mean changes in confidence were analysed with independent samples t-tests using a non-inferiority margin of -0.5. Subgroup analyses explored differences by professional role, physician seniority, and the effects of individual preparation on baseline confidence. Annual course evaluations provided participant feedback.
In total, 180 (21%) participants completed the pre-course and one-day post-course questionnaires. The cohorts differed significantly by sex (p=0.021), profession (p=0.048) and physician experience (p=0.025). Both formats significantly improved confidence, with the blended-learning course demonstrating non-inferior improvements in technical (MD 0.06, 95%-CI [-0.14;0.26]) and non-technical skills (MD 0.09, 95%-CI [-0.09;0.26]). However, non-technical confidence declined after preparation in the blended-learning cohort (MD -0.21, p=0.042). Feedback revealed varied perceptions of course relevance related to professional background.
The blended-learning format is non-inferior to the traditional model in enhancing DSATC participants’ confidence. The decline in confidence after preparation may reflect increased awareness of learning needs, fostering self-directed learning. These findings support tailoring trauma education to diverse professional groups and encourage further research into blended-learning models in multidisciplinary trauma training.
 
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
 
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
Category
4 Trauma & Intensive Care organized by IATSIC
4.01 Trauma surgery
Submitted
250
Abstract Prizes
No
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript conforming to the format of orignial articles in the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025