International Society of Surgery (ISS)

Société Internationale de Chirurgie (SIC)

Integrated Societies: IATSIC | IASMEN | BSI | ISDS

INTRAOPERATIVE SPECIMEN ULTRASONOGRAPHY TO DETECT MARGINS IN BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY FOR NON-PALPABLE LESIONS AND COMPARISON WITH SPECIMEN MAMMOGRAPHY: ANALYSIS OF 132 CONSECUTIVE CASES sendhil1986@gmail.com

 
INTRAOPERATIVE SPECIMEN ULTRASONOGRAPHY TO DETECT MARGINS IN BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY FOR NON-PALPABLE LESIONS AND COMPARISON WITH SPECIMEN MAMMOGRAPHY: ANALYSIS OF 132 CONSECUTIVE CASES
Author Details
5
Including the presenting author
Sendhil Rajan sendhil1986@gmail.com Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Department of Breast Surgery Norwich United Kingdom *
Lukschana Senathirajah lukschana.senathirajah@nnuh.nhs.uk Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Department of Breast Surgery Norwich United Kingdom
Abdullah Al-Nsour abdullah.al-nsour@nnuh.nhs.uk Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Department of Breast Surgery Norwich United Kingdom
David Newman david.newman@nnuh.nhs.uk Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Department of Radiology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Norwich United Kingdom
Maged Hussien maged.hussien@nnuh.nhs.uk Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Department of Breast Surgery Norwich United Kingdom
Sendhil Rajan
sendhil1986@gmail.com
United Kingdom
Abstract
Oral or Poster
Intra-operative specimen ultrasonography(SU) has been proposed as a cost effective tool to confirm clear margins during breast conserving surgery. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of SU to detect clear radial margins in patients undergoing wide local excision(WLE) for non-palpable lesions and compare SU with Specimen Mammography(SM).
This retrospective analysis included all patients who underwent WLE with SU and SM for invasive breast cancer and mass-forming DCIS between 2018-2022 at a tertiary care hospital. After WLE, SU was performed by the operating surgeon and reported as clear, or close margin(<10mm); and the results were compared with SM & pathological radial margins.
137 lesions(132 patients) were included. Median age was 66 years; most patients(67.5%) were screen-detected. 128 patients(97%) had unifocal disease. The majority of tumours were invasive ductal, no special type(79%) and Grade 1/2(68%), the median tumour size was 15mm. A total of 548 SU/SM radial margins was recorded for 137 tumours. A total of 22/548 radial margins were positive (19/137 specimens). SM had a slightly higher sensitivity than SU, however this was reflective in just one additional specimen where SM identified a close margin and SU did not. SU had a sensitivity & specificity of 68.2% & 96.9%, comparable with SM(72.7% & 96.4%), p=0.6115/1.000.
In the largest series till date for non-palpable lesions, SU was a quick and reliable method to assess WLE margins with an overall accuracy of 82.5%, equivalent to SM. This will have maximal use in centres that do not have SM facilities and in resource-limited settings.
 
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
 
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
Category
5 Breast Surgery organized by BSI
5.02 Breast Cancer
Withdrawn
250
Abstract Prizes
Yes
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript conforming to the format of orignial articles in the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025