ISS/SIC
Journal (WJS)
Congress
Create Account
Login
International Society of Surgery (ISS)
Société Internationale de Chirurgie (SIC)
Integrated Societies: IATSIC | IASMEN | BSI | ISDS
COMPARISON OF WOUND INFUSION CATHETER VERSUS EPIDURAL CATHETER FOR ANALGESIA AFTER MIDLINE INCISION FOR MAJOR ABDOMINAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS.
dr.aliyasen1@gmail.com
 
Back
Slot ID
Abstract Title
COMPARISON OF WOUND INFUSION CATHETER VERSUS EPIDURAL CATHETER FOR ANALGESIA AFTER MIDLINE INCISION FOR MAJOR ABDOMINAL SURGERY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS.
Author Details
No. of Authors
8
Including the presenting author
Author 1
Mohamed Albendary dr.mohamed.albendary@gmail.com University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Department of General Surgery Leicester United Kingdom
Author 2
Hussam Mohamed husamseddig12@gmail.com Wrexham Maelor Hospital Department of General Surgery Wrexham United Kingdom
Author 3
Salma Saeed Mohammed drsalmasaeed@live.com University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Department of Anaesthesia Leicester United Kingdom
Author 4
Dina Nada dina.nada@uhl-tr.nhs.uk University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Department of Anaesthesia Leicester United Kingdom
Author 5
Asaad Mohamedahmed asaad003@hotmail.com Arar Central Hospital Department of Anaesthesia Arar Saudi Arabia
Author 6
Mohamed Refaie m.refaie.surg.uk@gmail.com Glan Clwyd Hospital Department of General Surgery Rhyl United Kingdom
Author 7
Mohamed Elaraby malaraby30@gmail.com Glan Clwyd Hospital Department of General Surgery Rhyl United Kingdom
Author 8
Ali Yasen Mohamedahmed dr.aliyasen1@gmail.com Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust General surgery Kettering United Kingdom *
Author 9
Author 10
Author 11
Author 12
Presenting Author Name
Ali Yasen Mohamedahmed
Presenting Author Email
dr.aliyasen1@gmail.com
Presenting Author Country
United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract type
Oral only
Introduction *
To evaluate comparative outcomes of continuous wound infusion catheter (WC) versus Epidural analgesia (EP) for analgesia after laparotomy for major abdominal surgery.
Material & Method *
A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus was conducted, and all randomised controlled trials comparing continuous wound infusion catheter versus Epidural infusion for analgesia after midline laparotomy were included. Overall pain scores, total morphine consumption, respiratory depression, catheter-related complications, time of first bowel movement, and Length of hospital stay (LOS) were set as outcome parameters for the meta-analysis.
Results *
Twelve RCTs were pooled in a meta-analysis, involving a total of 778 patients who received WC (n=390) or EP (n=388). There was no difference in pain scores at rest and movement between the two groups at 24-hour [P=0.85 and P=0.30, respectively] and 48-hour [P=0.33 and P=0.06, respectively]. However, subgroup analysis excluding subcutaneous catheters showed favourable pain scores on movement at 48 hours of use (MD-0.97,P=0.03). The LOS was shorter in the WC group [MD,-0.50;P=0.00001](Figure 1). There were no significant differences in cumulative Morphine consumption [P=0.33], return of bowel function [P=0.13], respiratory depression [P=0.43] or catheter site infection [P=0.16].
Conclusion *
WC provides comparable postoperative analgesia to EP; however, it is associated with a shorter hospital stay following midline laparotomy. Although there is a trend of reduced opiate use and catheter-related complications in some studies, this was not evident from the pooled data.
File Upload #1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1258/b4f8391589739c03632100c6c63ccb75.jpg
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
File Upload #2
Only accept images in .jpg or .png format. The image size must not exceed 1 MB.
Category
Select Main Category
1 General Topics organized by ISS/SIC
Select Sub Category
1.03 General Surgery
Submission Status
Withdrawn
Word counter
222
Abstract Prizes
Eligible for the BSI Free Paper Prize
No
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript conforming to the format of orignial articles in the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
Eligible for the Grassi Prize
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
Eligible for the Kitajima Prize
No
- Author must be age 40 or younger
- One of the authors must be a member of ISDS
- Presenting author must register to the congress by 30 November 2025
- Author must submit a full-length manuscript to the World Journal of Surgery WJS by 30 November 2025
Vimeo Link